Above is an audio/visual version of the following article by The Good Citizen (here condensed to a 13-minute video, with my own additions and selected photographs). You can click on the image below for access to the full article:
If they put me on trial for this when I return to Germany, I’ll claim ignorance. They’ll say ignorance of the law is no excuse. It’ll be willful ignorance because I haven’t looked into what you can and can’t say about the Nuremberg Trials in Germany. I’ll just assume that you can’t tell the truth about them, and as the video above is full of truths, I guess I’m guilty.
Setting the record straight on the Nuremberg Trials is important. Apart from being a key step in freeing Germany from their crushing war-guilt burden, it’s simply important to tell the truth about history. But this isn’t why the idea didn’t gain much favor from kla, or at least censorship laws weren’t the reason Bernd gave for preferring not to do this one. There’s no hard feelings about having to do this myself; I actually kind of agreed with his reasoning and I’d thought of this too before getting into it: These calls to hold a Nuremberg 2 are well intentioned. We need to put on trial the Pfizer execs and the rest of the Big Pharma Big Shots; the governments who locked us down; the companies and governments and schools who required the clot shot; etc. Not to mention the treasonous behavior of the government in a hundred other ways- we need public tribunals to put these devils away. Bernd’s objection was that we don’t want to put a damper on the zeal and efforts of people who want to expose the truth about the Covid-19 fraud. Their desire to put the criminals on the dock is totally legitimate.
It’s just that using the name ‘Nuremberg’ is misleading. In this video you’ll find out why.
And again, here is the link to the original article.
Share this post